I'm not really in the market for a new bike, but you know how it is. Always fun to look at the new stuff and get to ride something new and different.
I'm currently on a '16 FZ 09. I like the slick , new style removable factory luggage options that some bikes offer. It looks good on the bike and sleek when it's off. I thought that would be handy, and I hear great things about Triumph's T Plane triples, so I decided to start shopping.
Basically, let's replace my FZ 09 with something similar ( 117hp, 417lbs, minimal electronics) but maybe more practical. Really wanting to try a T Plane
Long story short....
Speed Triple 1200 RS has good performance, but even with trading the clipons for bars I'm not sure the ergos are fixable. Luggage mounting would be a hassle and the $20 otd price tag ain't for me. Riddled with electronics.
Tiger Sport 660 is exactly what I'm looking for (don't care about windshields, but love the styling), but not with a 80hp 660. For some reason Triumph don't have that with their 900 triple engine in it.
Tiger 900 is down about 20hp and about 50-60 lbs heavier. Styling is great, but the seats are so low feeling even in the highest position. Factory luggage is just the standard adv style panniers that resembles microwaves mounted to your bike, so can't get excited about that. 19" front doesn't thrill me either. Riddled with electronics.
Got excited when I spotted a Tiger 850 Sport across the showroom in a beautiful orange color. Ooh, a Sport model. Nope, still has a 19" front. It's less riddled with electronics, which is a plus for me ...but for some reason they neutered the bike from 94hp down to 80, or something like that.
Street Triple headlights are kinda hard to swallow and the Speed Twin styling doesn't do much for me. Triumph doesn't make a nice, modern upright naked bike on 17's and that kinda shocked me.
Harley got nothing to offer. Still. Sadly.
Love what Royal Enfield has been up to lately, but nothing with the power:weight ratio to get me excited.
BMW F900R or XR looks amazing and the handling gets rave reviews from everyone. Great! Nice, stylized factory luggage is an option. Even better! Riddled with electronics. Meh, if they hold up I can live with them. BMW claims 94hp, but dyno reports are showing low 80's to the tire. Don't really want to take a 30+ hp loss while picking up an extra 50lbs of weight, so that idea is fizzling out.
My buddy's 890 Duke is super cool, but doesn't offer anything my Yamaha can't, and the engine is so dang noisy. 1290 Duke looks cool with it's factory bags, but the price for the GT bikes starts getting crazy. Riddled with electronics.
Honda won't give us a naked Africa Twin on 17's.
FTR1200 is wicked cool, but rather pricey and they kinda look dorky on 17's vs the original rim sizes. Riddled with electronics.
Kawasaki intent to build only four cylinders and 180° twins. Can't get excited there.
Suzuki kinda stuck on the four cylinders as well.
Honda Hornet 750 is extremely interesting to me, but not sure it'll ever make it to The States. Looks like it'll also be riddled with electronics.
Are Yamaha MT bikes really that special? I just can't really find much that compares on power output and weight, even putting price aside. But most importantly, EVERYTHING is absolutely RIDDLED with electronics!
I totally get that some folks want all the "electronics suites" and I'm glad it exists. But I hate it. Why do bikes need to rival sedan prices because of electronic packages? You can't sell a mechanical version and just let the tech lovers pay more for their desired "upgraded" version? It has to be shoved on to everyone?
Why does everything need LED lights? I don't want to be stuck having to spend $2k if my headlight goes out, or $700 if my tail light pops. It seems like gone are the days of swinging in Walmart at 1am to grab a $12 H4 when your low beam burns out.
I absolutely love the tech and performance of modern engine and chassis designs. Bikes are amazing and so much better then 20 years ago. But it really feels like the electronics are killing them. I guess it'd be ok if you plan to swap bikes every year and just always have a warranty to fall back on. Maybe that's the goal. But it makes me sad to see so many impressive machines and realize that they are a fleeting thing. Once the electronics start dying that the rest of the machine is designed to rely on...they're headed to the scrap yard.
We've got some of the best engines and chassis ever, but they're gonna fade away when replacement parts aren't available. That seems like such an incredible, avoidable waste.
Can we make motorcycles machines again?
I'm currently on a '16 FZ 09. I like the slick , new style removable factory luggage options that some bikes offer. It looks good on the bike and sleek when it's off. I thought that would be handy, and I hear great things about Triumph's T Plane triples, so I decided to start shopping.
Basically, let's replace my FZ 09 with something similar ( 117hp, 417lbs, minimal electronics) but maybe more practical. Really wanting to try a T Plane
Long story short....
Speed Triple 1200 RS has good performance, but even with trading the clipons for bars I'm not sure the ergos are fixable. Luggage mounting would be a hassle and the $20 otd price tag ain't for me. Riddled with electronics.
Tiger Sport 660 is exactly what I'm looking for (don't care about windshields, but love the styling), but not with a 80hp 660. For some reason Triumph don't have that with their 900 triple engine in it.
Tiger 900 is down about 20hp and about 50-60 lbs heavier. Styling is great, but the seats are so low feeling even in the highest position. Factory luggage is just the standard adv style panniers that resembles microwaves mounted to your bike, so can't get excited about that. 19" front doesn't thrill me either. Riddled with electronics.
Got excited when I spotted a Tiger 850 Sport across the showroom in a beautiful orange color. Ooh, a Sport model. Nope, still has a 19" front. It's less riddled with electronics, which is a plus for me ...but for some reason they neutered the bike from 94hp down to 80, or something like that.
Street Triple headlights are kinda hard to swallow and the Speed Twin styling doesn't do much for me. Triumph doesn't make a nice, modern upright naked bike on 17's and that kinda shocked me.
Harley got nothing to offer. Still. Sadly.
Love what Royal Enfield has been up to lately, but nothing with the power:weight ratio to get me excited.
BMW F900R or XR looks amazing and the handling gets rave reviews from everyone. Great! Nice, stylized factory luggage is an option. Even better! Riddled with electronics. Meh, if they hold up I can live with them. BMW claims 94hp, but dyno reports are showing low 80's to the tire. Don't really want to take a 30+ hp loss while picking up an extra 50lbs of weight, so that idea is fizzling out.
My buddy's 890 Duke is super cool, but doesn't offer anything my Yamaha can't, and the engine is so dang noisy. 1290 Duke looks cool with it's factory bags, but the price for the GT bikes starts getting crazy. Riddled with electronics.
Honda won't give us a naked Africa Twin on 17's.
FTR1200 is wicked cool, but rather pricey and they kinda look dorky on 17's vs the original rim sizes. Riddled with electronics.
Kawasaki intent to build only four cylinders and 180° twins. Can't get excited there.
Suzuki kinda stuck on the four cylinders as well.
Honda Hornet 750 is extremely interesting to me, but not sure it'll ever make it to The States. Looks like it'll also be riddled with electronics.
Are Yamaha MT bikes really that special? I just can't really find much that compares on power output and weight, even putting price aside. But most importantly, EVERYTHING is absolutely RIDDLED with electronics!
I totally get that some folks want all the "electronics suites" and I'm glad it exists. But I hate it. Why do bikes need to rival sedan prices because of electronic packages? You can't sell a mechanical version and just let the tech lovers pay more for their desired "upgraded" version? It has to be shoved on to everyone?
Why does everything need LED lights? I don't want to be stuck having to spend $2k if my headlight goes out, or $700 if my tail light pops. It seems like gone are the days of swinging in Walmart at 1am to grab a $12 H4 when your low beam burns out.
I absolutely love the tech and performance of modern engine and chassis designs. Bikes are amazing and so much better then 20 years ago. But it really feels like the electronics are killing them. I guess it'd be ok if you plan to swap bikes every year and just always have a warranty to fall back on. Maybe that's the goal. But it makes me sad to see so many impressive machines and realize that they are a fleeting thing. Once the electronics start dying that the rest of the machine is designed to rely on...they're headed to the scrap yard.
We've got some of the best engines and chassis ever, but they're gonna fade away when replacement parts aren't available. That seems like such an incredible, avoidable waste.
Can we make motorcycles machines again?