What's new
By:
Filters

Scooter Girls

CTG said:
I like artistic content. It is people like you, and I had you specifically in mind who turn it into a peek show and a place to share your soft porn. You should have been banned a couple of weeks ago, but mods only removed the pic that was clearly over the line. This is after rhetorically asking where the line is and being sent a link to the rules.
Click to expand...
Scooter Girls threads are always filled with soft porn… so why try to change that? No need to give JVB grief over it. At least the old guys slip in a picture of a girl actually riding a scooter once in a while.
 
CTG said:
I like artistic content. It is people like you, and I had you specifically in mind who turn it into a peek show and a place to share your soft porn. You should have been banned a couple of weeks ago, but mods only removed the pic that was clearly over the line. This is after rhetorically asking where the line is and being sent a link to the rules.
Click to expand...
There's a lot in life that we like and don't like. The neat thing is, we all get to make our own personal choices over what we wish to engage with and things we'd rather not. I find passing by those things I don't like much easier than trying to convince the source of those things their worldviews are wrong, and mine are right.
 
fd2e434126ffe5452075725558f66539.jpg
 
Andrew said:
Scooter Girls threads are always filled with soft porn… so why try to change that? No need to give JVB grief over it. At least the old guys slip in a picture of a girl actually riding a scooter once in a while.
Click to expand...

There really isn't much need for it with the amount of porn available to you. 99% of what I see in this thread could for better or worse be considered artistic. I would much prefer to look at a beautiful woman on a motorcycle than some filthy old man. But, there are a couple of people who push the boundaries... and the people who press the like button.
 
Last edited:
I came over from that other site, and new here. help me out, if one can. What is the difference between an up-skirt and one in a bikini? Garments appear the same or at least very similar. Thanks, don't want to be unintentionally offensive, with a post. dd50 tp
 
Personally I'm offended that the chick in her underwear doesn't have a proper helmet like the other lady. Neither has proper riding attire, but I'm prepared to accept that.
 
Dirtdreamer50 said:
I came over from that other site, and new here. help me out, if one can. What is the difference between an up-skirt and one in a bikini? Garments appear the same or at least very similar. Thanks, don't want to be unintentionally offensive, with a post. dd50 tp
Click to expand...

I suggested a seperate thread to discuss art and culture. I would have read the posts

And it took me years to get the tatted up harley wife to wear a helmet. Haha what the hell do I know
 
Danno said:
Where is the positive encouragement for us to meet your standards? I need to own half the state of nc and have a 1000 employees to be your level. Your insight will only ring like a tyrant to us pleebs.
Click to expand...

You must be short of comprehension skills.
 
sc-surfer said:
So....just to be clear....



THIS is offensive....because we're seeing 'up-skirt'




...But THIS is not because she's showing it off directly...???

Just want to be clear...
Click to expand...


Voyeuristic vs soft porn. :dunno No need for either really.
 
Last edited:
CTG said:
You must be short of comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
Like I said. Oh great one enlighten us on a seperate thread. You stepped into the wild west. We have many females that flash way more skin than this thread and are 1000 times more intimidating than you.

A great skill is to only comprehend what I want. It is a dude thing. And I am quite proud of it. I have some lost wax titianium castings cooling...later

But as always best wishes.
 
Last edited:
CTG said:
Voyeuristic vs soft porn. :dunno No need for either really.
Click to expand...
That's really splitting semantic hairs. Obviously one makes you more uncomfortable than the other but that is really a subjective view. Objectively (assuming both ladies were photographed willingly) there is zero difference. Subjective taste is just fine, we all have our own versions, but to tell others that they should be offended by your subjective view is not useful.
 
sc-surfer said:
That's really splitting semantic hairs. Obviously one makes you more uncomfortable than the other but that is really a subjective view. Objectively (assuming both ladies were photographed willingly) there is zero difference. Subjective taste is just fine, we all have our own versions, but to tell others that they should be offended by your subjective view is not useful.
Click to expand...
What I hope for the future's sake of this forum, is that the dreaded WOKEISM doesn't take control. Have to agree with the attached post, that other's opinion must align itself with another's, is simply wrong and detrimental to all concerned.
 
ZoomerP said:
You're not alone, but there are reasons to avoid hosting what could reasonably be deemed pornography.

Aside from potential legal issues, sites that allow pornography can be classified differently by search engines, leading to less traffic. Some networks blacklist sites that contain pornography, which is another annoyance if someone wants to visit a site during a work break, or if they're visiting in the company of others. I'm sure there are other reasons that allowing porn isn't worth the trouble.
Click to expand...


Sure. I can get behind that. That's not a moral judgement but just a reality of how things work...and any site has the right to make the rules they think are best for them. It's the moral superiority some people pedal that gets to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back Refresh