What's new

Why are you here?

Why did you come to this forum?

  • I was banned from ADV Rider

    Votes: 14 9.7%
  • The VS takeover will ruin ADV Rider so I switched

    Votes: 40 27.8%
  • I'm still on ADV Rider and here as well.

    Votes: 101 70.1%
  • What's ADV Rider? I just wandered in off the street

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 24 16.7%

  • Total voters
    144
I mentioned something about that in one of the threads about selling the forum. Someone posted that the "heart of the Forum" or something like that was the basement. My reply was that while the basement was probably the most active part of the forum, someone with 80,000 posts with 75,000 of them in CSM was not really contirbuting much to the forum. I didn't name any names but the fact is that a large percentage of the inmates with really high post counts spend most of their time in CSM. It was easy to check in that forum unless someone hid their profile. Just go to someone's profile and look at Areas. I don't see that feature in this forum.

Posts in Chit Chat and the sub forums do not contribute to post count.

When setting this place up, we debated adding a place for political discussion. I can go either way on it. The reason I am for it, is that it gives people a place to vent. Also, some people like to slip political discussion in almost everything they post, so as a Mod, it gives me a place to move it without deleting or censoring someone. The reason I am against it, it seems to bring out a lot of childish name calling and sometimes people let their feeling spill over into other parts of the forum.
 
I mentioned something about that in one of the threads about selling the forum. Someone posted that the "heart of the Forum" or something like that was the basement. My reply was that while the basement was probably the most active part of the forum, someone with 80,000 posts with 75,000 of them in CSM was not really contirbuting much to the forum. I didn't name any names but the fact is that a large percentage of the inmates with really high post counts spend most of their time in CSM. It was easy to check in that forum unless someone hid their profile. Just go to someone's profile and look at Areas. I don't see that feature in this forum.
Thankfully I didn't fall into that category. The vast majority of my posts were not even in JM, very few in CSM, especially later.
 
Thankfully I didn't fall into that category. The vast majority of my posts were not even in JM, very few in CSM, especially later.
I looked at the profiles of the top dozen inmates by post count. A few hid their profiles. The rest all had the vast majority of posts in the basement except for you. You actually posted in motorcycle related areas. What a concept!
 
Posts in Chit Chat and the sub forums do not contribute to post count.

When setting this place up, we debated adding a place for political discussion. I can go either way on it. The reason I am for it, is that it gives people a place to vent. Also, some people like to slip political discussion in almost everything they post, so as a Mod, it gives me a place to move it without deleting or censoring someone. The reason I am against it, it seems to bring out a lot of childish name calling and sometimes people let their feeling spill over into other parts of the forum.
The way you set it up seems like a good idea to me:thumb
 
I mentioned something about that in one of the threads about selling the forum. Someone posted that the "heart of the Forum" or something like that was the basement. My reply was that while the basement was probably the most active part of the forum, someone with 80,000 posts with 75,000 of them in CSM was not really contirbuting much to the forum. I didn't name any names but the fact is that a large percentage of the inmates with really high post counts spend most of their time in CSM. It was easy to check in that forum unless someone hid their profile. Just go to someone's profile and look at Areas. I don't see that feature in this forum.
The hidden profile is a pretty good tell.

The CSM regulars became so enraged at my gentle mocking that they started a thread called "CSMers who Ride" or something like that. To SHOW how much they ride, dammit! That wasn't enough, so they started a "Where's Jim Moore" thread where they told about (theoretical) rides they went on in which they didn't see me. And they still banned me. You'd think they'd keep me around just to use as a punching bag.
 
What I learned about CSM, is that it's full of pussies, just waiting to attack. My thread which I started in the Inmates section, was punted to CSM. All I was trying to do, was process the fucking rage and feelings I had after watching some druggie scumbags steal glass milk bottles, for the purpose of just dumping the milk, and turning in the bottles for the $2 deposit. I was fucking roasted for doing nothing more than sharing what I felt and how I processed the situation. I was seen by several as a Dirty Harry vigilante for simply pointing out that part of my thought process involved considering the use of my gun to stop these assholes. Apparently just telling these guys how my thought process works, even though it was ultimately a non-violent conclusion which I came up with, did not matter to those fucking flowers.

I wonder if the mod, Ian, is over here, looking at us. I wonder if any of the mods come here for a peek.

S.C.
Take a peek into CI in this forum. It has the same rotten smell that CSM does in ADVR. It's not the mods who make it stink.
 
Are the mods on advrider, being paid? I'm trying to figure out what their motivation is in sticking around.
fafa:ca443f4786,front-c,648,590,750,1000-bg,f8f8f8.jpg
 
I joined the other place early on in its creation, mid 2001. It's been very sad to see the devolution of was once a fantastic community. I can't decipher the secret mod code over there any more, other than to just assume they're a bunch of woke virtue signaling snowflakes whose beliefs are the only ones that matter over there. It's pointless to do much more than lurk at this point. Hopefully, we can get most of the meaningful content migrated over before it's too late and gone for good.

I'm sure someone from the other place are lurking here to serve as "content police" based on VS's TOS. Then again, they give such little fucks to their own site, so who knows?

scottcolbath , keep pokin' the bear, man. It the best entertainment in recent weeks over there.
 
Last edited:
I think I've deciphered what's going on with the ads over there. Both sides of the issue make sense.

The site isn't putting ad content on the pages and serving it to members. It sells blank ad space to a service. The ad content is pulled from the ad service, and it fills the blank spaces on a member's device, not the site's server. The ad content is based at least in part on data pulled from a member's computer, not from the site, so the mods have little control over what the ad service puts in those blank spaces. Everyone may see different ad content because it's personalized and sent directly to their device - it never hits the forum's server.

At best, it sounds like staff can complain to an ad service in an attempt to have specific content or types of content removed from the available options sent to members. It really is out of their hands as long as the ad service is filling the blank spaces they bought with content that meets the terms of the agreement (correct size, no blinking, no auto-playing video, etc.).

On the other hand, if a forum bans a type of content, yet members see ads containing that same content when they view the forum, it's understandable that some members might see that as problematic. If I'm correct, it would've helped if someone had taken the time to explain the situation better, and made it clear that staff had little ability to alter the ad content sent to members.

I would've posted this in scottcolbath 's continuing Happy Fun Time with Ian Festival over there, but it's not worth the headache.
I saw some of that discussion as well as the thread of scottcolbath that got moved to CSM. Since I don't see any ads on that forum the first discussion didn't mean that much to me but I get why he was upset. As for the other thread, once a thread get moved to CSM it WILL turn into a shitstorm and any further discussion is pretty much a waste of time. I'll occasionally look around in CSM but very rarely post anything. Getting involved in discussions there would just result an frustration and a big headache.

One thing I like about this forum is that the upstairs is much more active than the basement. That's not the case over there. Start a thread on a controversial topic there and it will be 20 pages long overnight.:loco

Stay out of the basement there and I still don't see any changes.
 
I think I've deciphered what's going on with the ads over there. Both sides of the issue make sense.

The site isn't putting ad content on the pages and serving it to members. It sells blank ad space to a service. The ad content is pulled from the ad service, and it fills the blank spaces on a member's device, not the site's server. The ad content is based at least in part on data pulled from a member's device, not from the site, so the mods have little control over what the ad service puts in those blank spaces. Everyone may see different ad content because it's personalized and sent directly to their device - it never hits the forum's server.

At best, it sounds like staff can complain to an ad service in an attempt to have specific content or types of content removed from the available options sent to members. It really is out of their hands as long as the ad service is filling the blank spaces they bought with content that meets the terms of the agreement (correct size, no blinking, no auto-playing video, etc.).

On the other hand, if a forum bans a type of content, yet members see ads containing that same content when they view the forum, it's understandable that some members might see that as problematic. If I'm correct, it would've helped if someone had taken the time to explain the situation better, and made it clear that staff had little ability to alter the ad content sent to members.

I would've posted this in scottcolbath 's continuing Happy Fun Time with Ian Festival over there, but it's not worth the headache.

You're spot on about how that works. That being said, I'm sure if they (Advrider) told the ad service/provider that they did not want any gun ads, it could be dealt with. I'm sure that same ad provider which AdvRider uses, has tailored ads for sites which are more adult oriented, and advertise porn sites. And that same company also services other websites which are more family friendly, and they are completely capable of giving websites what they want, and do not want. Bottom line, they sell any and all types of ads, from toy ads for kids, to ads for 12 inch dildos for the kids' moms.

Also, I don't blame the mods for all this nonsense. They are just the drones, doing what they are told to do by the site owners/operators. But they sort of hide behind their position of power, and try to justify how things are, while avoiding stepping on their own dicks. I'm sure the first mod to agree with my assertations on this whole fucking mess, would not be a mod any longer.

S.C.
 
You're spot on about how that works. That being said, I'm sure if they (Advrider) told the ad service/provider that they did not want any gun ads, it could be dealt with. I'm sure that same ad provider which AdvRider uses, has tailored ads for sites which are more adult oriented, and advertise porn sites. And that same company also services other websites which are more family friendly, and they are completely capable of giving websites what they want, and do not want. Bottom line, they sell any and all types of ads, from toy ads for kids, to ads for 12 inch dildos for the kids' moms.

Also, I don't blame the mods for all this nonsense. They are just the drones, doing what they are told to do by the site owners/operators. But they sort of hide behind their position of power, and try to justify how things are, while avoiding stepping on their own dicks. I'm sure the first mod to agree with my assertations on this whole fucking mess, would not be a mod any longer.

S.C.
No, most mods just aren't drones, maybe those who are paid to do the job and wish they were doing something else, but the volunteers have an ulterior motive. They become mods to fill something missing in their lives. Possibly it's an opportunity to assume a role of position and power over someone because they feel so ineffectual in their real lives? Or possibly they were unpopular in grade school, so they compensate as an adult and as a mod they have a captive audience of sorts? I'm not trying to be malicious in any way, I sincerely believe that. I think they are a people with very little self awareness, and they somehow convince themselves they're doing the community some favour by doing the job, but down deep they're looking for something. Having said that, I've only been banned from one forum and that was advrider, so I don't have some grudge against mods going back years due to conflict. I honestly believe there's something wrong with them. Don't get me started on actors, I've worked with actors…
 
No, most mods just aren't drones, maybe those who are paid to do the job and wish they were doing something else, but the volunteers have an ulterior motive. They become mods to fill something missing in their lives. Possibly it's an opportunity to assume a role of position and power over someone because they feel so ineffectual in their real lives? Or possibly they were unpopular in grade school, so they compensate as an adult and as a mod they have a captive audience of sorts? I'm not trying to be malicious in any way, I sincerely believe that. I think they are a people with very little self awareness, and they somehow convince themselves they're doing the community some favour by doing the job, but down deep they're looking for something. Having said that, I've only been banned from one forum and that was advrider, so I don't have some grudge against mods going back years due to conflict. I honestly believe there's something wrong with them. Don't get me started on actors, I've worked with actors…
I don't think you can make blanket statements about mods. I don't even know how one becomes a mod on ADVR. Do they volunteer? Are they asked? I think if I had been asked a few years ago to be an ADV Rider mod I would have considered it because I cared about the forum and would be willing to help it run smoothly. But, no one asked and I don't plan to volunteer.

I am a mod on a very small local forum. Other than moving some spam I have not really done any moderating. I point out issues I see or make suggestions to the guy who is the Administrator but basically I don't do much. A big forum like ADVR requires more moderating.

We have mods on this forum. I haven't seen any moderating issues here. I think the mods here want to make this a good forum and are willing to contribute some of their time to make that happen. Problems happen when mods use their power to satisfy themselves rather than for the good of the forum. This is true of any people who are in a position of authority.
 
Since we are on the topic of mods, there is a question I have been wanting to ask. What exactly is a Super Moderator? Is that a moderator with a cape? Maybe a moderator to rule all moderators like Lord of the Rings??:scratch
 
Then, please tell me what your motivation is when becoming a mod, it makes little sense to me? Again, I understand why a person would do it for money, they're underemployed, and it's a side hustle, but as a volunteer? If you want to volunteer, go do something more productive like meals on wheels, or a food bank.
 
I've joined here due to Kickstandsup posting on ADVr about the takeover by VS...I have also been on other VS forums that once were quite active and now are virtual ghost towns..While i am still on the other site..i have noticed that all the local players and contributors to local tag games and associated threads in the Raleigh Nc area..have suddenly died off..not one member is still active in playing the local TriTor tag game..It started out so nice and has become a microcosm of the site in genereal...a good idea with good intentions that has gone bad..the well has been poisoned and no one will drink from it anymore...That day is coming for Advr as it already has for the TriTor...
 
Church State Money. The cesspool of ADVr.

I had no idea that it even existed until someone brought it up in the thread on ADVr about VS buying the forum. That was a big reason I left. I was disillusioned to discover the level of hatred and animous exhibited by the members there. Were these the same people who I''d be talking to in the on-topic subforums? The same people who's RRs I'd been following? Wishing death upon some guy who caught some covids. Seeing mods joining right in.

Up till then I thought it was this near perfect utopia of riders. People who spent time compiling a map of all the people offering a place for strangers to stay.
Thanks....I manage to stay out of there somehow..except for overzealois ashole moderators that bounce my posts in the bikes forsale forum to the garbage thread in the cesspool section on ADVr....while others post the same shit as i but yet they're posts are untouched...
 
The site isn't putting ad content on the pages and serving it to members. It sells blank ad space to a service. The ad content is pulled from the ad service, and it fills the blank spaces on a member's device, not the site's server. The ad content is based at least in part on data pulled from a member's device, not from the site, so the mods have little control over what the ad service puts in those blank spaces. Everyone may see different ad content because it's personalized and sent directly to their device - it never hits the forum's server.
Thats 100% how this site works. VS is a massive company and they have ad sales team. Their sole job is to target companies and get them to buy ad space. Their ad packages range from ' advertise on just xyz site' to volume discounts where the advertiser can pick multiple sites to spread their impressions to. They can even pick a general topic, like motorcycles, to have their ads shown on all VS's motorcycle forums. So VS is VERY much in control of what ads show where.

I on the other hand am not a salesman and can't afford a sales guy. So we give our ad space to a company and they do their best to find advertisers with products that appeals to this audience. It's a very hard sell with a new site like this so many of the ads you see fall back to a general pool (so to speak) of advertisers. From there it goes one of two ways depending on the country you are in and your privacy settings. First choice from the ad company is if you allow them to look at your cookies and see what all you look at online and serves ads from what it learns there. These are 2nd most profitable. If you have all cookies blocked or in a country that doesn't allow it, it just grabs ads from people offering a fraction of what the ad space is worth but are willing to be 'fill in ads' on any site anywhere. These last two situations are 99% of what you see on here right now.

At best, it sounds like staff can complain to an ad service in an attempt to have specific content or types of content removed from the available options sent to members. It really is out of their hands as long as the ad service is filling the blank spaces they bought with content that meets the terms of the agreement (correct size, no blinking, no auto-playing video, etc.).
They can complain, or at least tell you they have. If they haven't already figured it out yet their complaints fall on deaf ears. VS bought the site for a premium to put their ads where they want. It's their business, don't think they didn't have some research on how much more ads they could sell with ADVr in their portfolio.

Bottom line, they sell any and all types of ads, from toy ads for kids, to ads for 12 inch dildos for the kids' moms.
Very likely, they will take any money given to them. The legal world has gotten tricky about advertising, I'd be willing to bet that if you are seeing dildo ads, you were looking at porn of some type. People say 'I never look at that stuff!!' and ..... maaayyyyybe they are telling the truth, maybe not. The trickery of the web is getting bad. All it takes is for you to get carpet bombed with email spam about the clitmaster 5000 and for you open the email without realizing what it is. Well, that pic in the email that loads form their server just told them thats a valid email and your curious about sex toys. Your on a list. So .. most of the times it's because somebody was surfing adult stuff .... sometimes it's malicious targeting. Either way .. the ad serving code is targeting just as it should. Nobody paying for ads wants to pay a premium for their ad to be displayed to the completely wrong audience ... there is a reason for it.

I gave the ad company a 13+ age target. Unless there is something on your computer to tell it otherwise it's fairly good at sticking to it.

Also, I don't blame the mods for all this nonsense. They are just the drones, doing what they are told to do by the site owners/operators.
I wouldn't blame them. They have been used to the OG ADVr for years and have been set on helping the community for years. Not getting in to the definition of your view of their 'help' was but thats what they were doing. They are just holding onto that now even though it's largely a .... novelty role in VS's eyes.

If one of us oversteps, please take it up with them in a private Conversation that includes Austin. I think that's the best way to address it. @Austin has made it clear that a heavy handed mod won't have a long tenure on ADVb. None of us want that, and I think we've lived up to that standard so far.
100%, Google's moto used to be "don't be evil" .... since they dropped it I've adopted it. Vindictive or virtue signaling will not be tolerated here. Everybody here should be here to talk riding & bikes. Take the rest of the BS to social media, thats what it seems to be for these days.

I honestly feel sorry for the ADVr mods. That probably reads in a cynical manner but it's not meant to be. Aside from how they acted to members, they are very much like the die-hards on pirate4x4 when irate4x4 launched. Some can't let go of the power but I think most have just made that role such a part of their responsibility they can't accept whats happened to the site. This is my second go at setting up an alternative home for a community and the first go around I thought they were 'power tripping' since they didn't get mod powers at the new place. After a few years I see they just ... want the comfort that was. Change is scary and I get it, especially if thats the only forum they are on thats been bought out by VS. So I don't blame them sticking around and trying to save the place. In my experience they are beating a dead horse .. but I get it. I hope they do sooner rather than later.

Mod'n is a funny thing. A lot of people want to be but don't get that it is work. IMO it sucks and I'm really thankful people want to do it. My goal is to have the community as a whole do most of the moderating. Pirate4x4 and now irate4x4 members are kind of aggressive when it comes to random assholes on the site. They are amazing at either running them off and are quick to use the reporting tool if they break the few rules we have. I hope to instill that her for the mod's sake. It's not at all about running off certain viewpoints, which is where it gets tricky to describe the 'community moderating' without being a part of the community and seeing it. Follow the core rules or get hell from the board ... I couldn't ask for more honestly. Mod powers aren't for pushing their beliefs ... it's to move a newb's post who accidentally posted in the wrong place, registers with a typo in their username ... silly stuff. What they certinally don't need is the chip on the shoulder many have towards them. I see it more that I ever did as a regular member on pirate. One of the more contributing mods on irate4x4 got wrapped up in a heated discussion about a topic that hit closer to home that most of the forum knows. He posted for a day or two arguing against what most, including myself, consider a distasteful, but not illegal, viewpoint as he 100% should have. I would have in his shoes. After a while he used his mod powers to zap the whole thread and he lost his mod status for it. He continued to be a active member, in the tech sections not just that thread, and after a few months we talked, he apologized and I asked him to be a mod again. It took him a few weeks to decide because he liked not having the burden but I'm glad he is a mod again. He's kind of a dick and a grumpy old man :fo2: but ... is a good mod. I don't see those second chances happening a lot but it did there.

Since we are on the topic of mods, there is a question I have been wanting to ask. What exactly is a Super Moderator? Is that a moderator with a cape? Maybe a moderator to rule all moderators like Lord of the Rings??
Those are Xenforo's definitions. You can make somebody a moderator of a specific forum, album, calendar etc. Supermods can moderate anyplace on the site. There are a few exceptions but I feel if I trust you to mod one section, and you happen to be surfing elsewhere on the site and see an issue I trust you to take care of it. Also requires far less mods to manage the site which is nice because of the number of forums and the diffrent time zones members are in.

🍻
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom Back Refresh