First off ... welcome
But when a [purported] human being does it, it's more difficult to casually dismiss.
100%, it's not like we're 5yrs old and need protection from adult type discussions. It's not easy to be a Mod here. We plan to keep speech
as free as possible here so aside from their added responsibilities they may often find themselves having put their own beliefs aside when proofing posts. This goes for replying to reported posts as well, the person who is reporting an issue they may have, could be something the mod agrees with but has to tell the reporter it doesn't violate posting rules and they both have to let it ride.
So the mods definitely deserve a tip of the hat for checking their own beliefs in order to allow all people in the sport to come and participate.
I'm reluctant to use ad blockers. I don't mind being The Product.
I appreciate that. There are minimal ads here intended to just keep the lights on. I have no intention of making a career or getting rich off this forum, I just hope that it pays for itself in the near future. irate4x4 on the other hand, I have been very open that I would like to make that into something that generates enough to support my family. Not through ads, through selling off-road parts and accessories which those members buy anyway. So even with that goal for that forum, they see the same volume of ads, in all the same places you all do.
Since you used 'ad blockers' and 'the product' in that post ... I want to point out for those not aware that adblockers are just as vile, if not more, than the ads themselves. To expand on what
Rectaltronics said, if you're not paying for it you're the product. Thats especially true for most all ad blockers. While they may block ads for you, they also know every single thing you do on the web ... and guess who pays for that? There are a slew business that want that data, especially Ad companies. Quick scenario: Say you are the perfect customer for Product X but you block all their ads trying to reach you. The adblockers see that and let Product X know that if they pay a bit more on a place without ad blockers, like FB or IG, they can reach you there. There is a ton of ways for ad blocker to make $$ by watching your traffic. Some ad blockers even allow avid cues to pay them to allow their ads to be displayed. I could go on and on but, but as the owner of a site ... with ads on it … expressing hate for ad blockers is likely mistaken as a move for my pocketbook.
I'm inclined to accuse these agencies of relying on this nonsense to turn views into clicks
You 100% should, you’re not totally wrong. These are typically the ad agency that creates the ads, not necessarily the company that manages them. The creators are hired by the company advertising their widget. They are under pressure to bring traffic/sales to their client. So sneaky movement is a good way to get a click and somebody on the clients site. The company managing the ad delivery wants those clicks so they make more $. So some of the more ethical ones, like we use, kill those methods when they see the ad submitted for publication. Others don’t because they want the $$ and this is typical for VS sites. Ad impressions (a display or view) could land $.40 per 1k impressions but a click can be $.20-$.30 per click. Some super niche sites like medical or insurance related ones can get $100, $200 even $400 per click. So shifting the ad with CSS as the curser is near the ad can be pretty profitable…… at the expense of the user’s experience.
Our ad management company does a good job filtering out those predatory ads. As with anything code related there is always somebody that codes a new way to slip those ads past them. I’d say they get 99% of them, I assume, I don’t have acces to the metrics of the ones blocked. I do know that if I report one during typical 9-5 M-F business hours it’s pulled from inventory very quickly. So if you if you see that … report it